DroopyBassets75 claimed: Many thanks for that tips on People bullets. The one explanation why I am making use of these is that I now experienced them loaded up for an AR and also a Mini-fourteen and even now Possess a thousand or so free fifty five grain Hornady FMJ bullets to work with.

The decapping pin during the sizing die will not be stout sufficient to knock these out without staying damaged, so deprime them ahead of resizing using a Exclusive die expressly designed for this endeavor.

If seeking to accumulate an automated powder-cost dispensing unit to speed up precision reloading, Do not choose the RCBS ChargeMaster Lite powder scale and dispenser by its name; the Minor Environmentally friendly equipment packs a hefty-bodyweight punch with speed and precision.

Posted: 5/3/2016 7:forty seven:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I've been attempting CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets.  However working with it.  I can mention that It appears to "feed" pretty much.  I've been utilizing my Hornady electronic powder measure/scale although working up my loads.  The CFE223 feeds so quick the powder evaluate can't properly meter it (the Digital a person).  It presents me constant over alarms.  Even using the mode button to slow down the metering in excess of environment it in "sluggish" would not perform.  I've not tried using it during the typical powder measure nonetheless but hope it would be extremely reliable. I did, kind of Blessed definitely, run across a very accurate BLC2 load a few selection outings back.

As we envisioned, the two spherical powders were incredibly shut. In spite of a 400x microscope, tiny measurements have been hard to discern. We couldn’t convey to a difference in the length of Varget vs H-4198, though it really is visually evident Varget has a larger diameter.

I have never had that occur (cling fires) in anything at all .308 Win sizing or beneath,  with normal loads. This means not decreased. That's Bizarre that you should have it occurring inside a. 223 But like you I'd a.related knowledge with ball powder inside of a .280 Rem load. My Remington seven hundred Mountain Rifle would shoot it with no challenges.

Up coming time you dump H335 inside of a 223 situation, flippantly touch the situation towards a functioning tumbler. It's going to settle the powder column down. Operates nicely for powder/cartridge combos which have been nearly always read more compressed loads (Varget and .223!)

Individually, my expertise and feeling of The 2 powders is practically the alternative of yours. CFE 223 will accomplish far better the longer your barrel is and also the heavier the bullet you use. My thoughts are that CFE 223 is correct over the verge of getting also sluggish of a powder to even use in 223.

A great deal of .223 shooters have burned many H335, since for very a while it was amongst the higher ball powders available for The task. It metered effectively from a powder evaluate and frequently shot pretty correctly.

H4350 - This Serious Extruded propellant is often a burning speed that's been regarded to shooters for many years. Through that time, Hodgdon has modernized H4350 by shortening the grains for improved metering and making it insensitive to very hot/cold temperatures.

Back again to old web-site Shut If there is nearly anything inside your cart, it will not be introduced over on the old internet site.

Unless of course you do have a pet bench rest load with H335 (hard to believe that) any of the above mentioned might be just good with

I'm thinking about buying up a bolt motion .223 and want to work with my older FMJ ammo for plinking. I don't want to result in extreme tension into the rifle or produce any avoidable harm. Sorry, I'm continue to new at this and just wish to be safe. Many thanks beforehand.

I’ve study terrific points about tac although. I’ve study it’s superior for lighter bullets? What’s your man’s load data for tac as well as 55gr’er. Thanks and sorry, I sense like I submit a good deal lol You're MY ONLY Buddies